Litigasi
Kes-kes baru bertambah setiap tahun dalam senarai kes kami yang dilaporkan/diterbitkan sejak 1995, sekarang berjumlah lebih 30, tentang mendapatkan semula hutang, penggulungan, injunksi dan bidang-bidang lain
New cases are added yearly since 1995 to our list of reported/ published cases, now numbering more than 30, on debt recovery, winding up, injunctions and other areas.
Alasan Penghakiman: Yap Kit Wah & 30 Ors v Yap Kim Choon @ Yap Siw Sin & 2 Ors bertarikh 13 haribulan Oktober, 2014
The Grounds of Judgment: Yap Kit Wah & 30 Ors v Yap Kim Choon @ Yap Siw Sin & 2 Ors dated October 13, 2014
-
Alasan Penghakiman:LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd v Saiful Rais Bin Shaiks Salim and 2 Others bertarikh 30 haribulan September, 2014
The Grounds of Decision: LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd v Saiful Rais Bin Shaiks Salim and 2 Others dated September 30, 2014
-
Alasan Penghakiman: Z. New Image Sdn Bhd v Loh Yok Liang bertarikh 5 haribulan Ogos, 2014.
The Grounds of Decision: N. Z. New Image Sdn Bhd v Loh Yok Liang dated August 5, 2014.
-
Perintah yang termeterai daripada Mahkamah Rayuan melalui W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03/2014 bertarikh 14 haribulan Ogos, 2014: Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd v Quintraz Sdn Bhd
The sealed order from the Court of Appeal vide W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03/2014 dated August 14, 2014: Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd v Quintraz Sdn Bhd
-
Alasan Penghakiman: Quintraz Sdn Bhd v Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhdbertarikh 5 haribulan Mac, 2014
The Grounds of Judgment: Quintraz Sdn Bhd v Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd dated March 5, 2014
-
Alasan Penghakiman: Bumitech Marketing Sdn Bhd v Suasa Efektif (M) Sdn Bhdbertarikh 10 haribulan Mei, 2012, satu kes dimana dua pengarah syarikat didapati menghina mahkamah dan dijatuhkan hukuman penjara dua minggu
The Grounds of Judgment: Bumitech Marketing Sdn Bhd v Suasa Efektif (M) Sdn Bhd dated May 10, 2012, a case where two company directors were held in contempt of court and sentenced to Two weeks’ imprisonment.
-
Alasan Penghakiman: CCM Chemicals Sdn Bhd v Wan Muhamad IbrisamWan Ibrahim bertarikh 23 haribulan Mei, 2011, [2011] 1 LNS 1011, satu kes dimana pengarah mendakwa yang dia tidak menandatangani jaminan, walau bagaimanapun penghakiman tetap diberikan.
The Grounds of Judgment: CCM Chemicals Sdn Bhd v Wan Muhamad Ibrisam Wan Ibrahim dated May 23, 2011, [2011] 1 LNS 1011, on a case where the director claimed that he did not sign the guarantee, nevertheless a judgment was granted.
-
Alasan Penghakiman: Choong Lee Kwang v Dayatera Roof Systems Sdn Bhd bertarikh 24 Julai, 2009, [2009] 1 LNS 1718 dimana pengarah memulakan tindakan penggulungan untuk menggulung syarikatnya sendiri
The Grounds of Judgment: Choong Lee Kwang v Dayatera Roof Systems Sdn Bhd dated July 24, 2009, [2009] 1 LNS 1718 where a director initiated a winding up action to wind up his own company.
-
Alasan Penghakiman: Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai Virian Tanzania Ltd.) v CNLT (Far East) Berhadbertarikh 16 haribulan Januari, 2009. Penggulungan Syarikat Awam yang Tersenarai dalam Pertukaran Saham, oleh pasukan yang diketuai oleh Encik Alex Chang.
The Grounds of Judgment: Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (Formerly known as Virian Tanzania Ltd.) v CNLT (Far East) Berhad dated January 16, 2009. The Winding Up of a Public Company Listed in the Stock Exchange, by a team led by Mr Alex Chang
-
FW Industries v Suitech(Alasan asal disediakan oleh Tuan Hakim Yang Arif Hishamudin), diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Undang-Undang Semasa: [2008] 3 CLJ 210. Dua petisyen untuk menggulung syarikat yang sama, petisyen klien kami adalah yang kedua dan mendapatkan perintah penggulungan.
FW Industries v Suitech (the Original grounds written by the learned Judge Hishamudin), published in the Current Law Journal: [2008] 3 CLJ 210. Two petitions to wind up the same company, our clients’ Petition was the second one and obtained the winding up order.
-
PECD V FREEHOLD(Alasan asal disediakan oleh Tuan Hakim, kini Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan Yang Arif Dato Vincent Ng), diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Undang-Undang Semasa: [2008] 3 CLJ 215. Dimana permohonan untuk menghalang klien kami daripada memfailkan petisyen penggulungan gagal.
