Litigation 诉讼

Litigation
New cases are added yearly since 1995 to our list of reported/ published cases, now numbering more than 30, on debt recovery, winding up, injunctions and other areas.
诉讼
自1995年以来,我们被报道/发表的案件列表每年都增加,包括债务追讨,公司清盘,禁止令和其他领域,目前列表的案件总数已超过30。

The Grounds of Judgment: Yap Kit Wah & 30 Ors v Yap Kim Choon @ Yap Siw Sin & 2 Ors dated October 13, 2014
判决的理由:2014年10月13日,叶基华(Yap Kit Wah) & 另外30 位 v 叶金聪(Yap Kim Choon) @ 叶穗心(Yap Siw Sin) & 另外两位

The Grounds of Decision: LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd v Saiful Rais Bin Shaiks Salim and 2 Others dated September 30, 2014
判定的理由:2014年9月30日,LGB Enginnering私营有限公司 v 塞尔夫拉伊斯 bin 萨伊萨琳(Saiful Rais b]Bin Shaiks Salim)和另外两位

The Grounds of Decision: N. Z. New Image Sdn Bhd v Loh Yok Liang dated August 5, 2014.
判定的理由:2014年8月5日,N. Z. New Image私营有限公司 v 罗玉良(Loh Yok Liang)

The sealed order from the Court of Appeal vide W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03/2014 dated August 14, 2014: Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd v Quintraz Sdn Bhd
上诉庭的指令 W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03/2014, 2014年8月14日:Fore-Sight市场营销私营有限公司 v Quintraz 私营有限公司

The Grounds of Judgment: Quintraz Sdn Bhd v Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd dated March 5, 2014
判决的理由:2014年3月5日,Quintraz私营有限公司 v Fore-Sight 市场营销私营公司

The Grounds of Judgment: Bumitech Marketing Sdn Bhd v Suasa Efektif (M) Sdn Bhd dated May 10, 2012, a case where two company directors were held in contempt of court and sentenced to two weeks’ imprisonment.
判决的理由:2012年5月10日,Bumitech 市场营销私营有限公司 v Suasa Efektif (M)私营有限公司,这事件的起因是两位公司董事因蔑视法庭而被判坐牢两个星期。

The Grounds of Judgment: CCM Chemicals Sdn Bhd v Wan Muhamad Ibrisam Wan Ibrahim dated May 23, 2011, [2011] 1 LNS 1011, on a case where the director claimed that he did not sign the guarantee, nevertheless a judgment was granted.
判决的理由:2011年5月23日,CCM Chemicals私营有限公司 v Wan Muhammad Ibrisam Wan Ibrahim,「2011」1 LNS 1011, 这事件是那位董事声称他没有签署担保书,尽管如此判决依然被授予。

The Grounds of Judgment: Choong Lee Kwang v Dayatera Roof Systems Sdn Bhd dated July 24, 2009, [2009] 1 LNS 1718 where a director initiated a winding up action to wind up his own company.
判决的理由:2009年7月24日,钟李光 v Dayatara 屋面系统公司,「2009」 1 LNS 1718 , 这案件是一位董事对自己的公司发起的清盘行动。

The Grounds of Judgment: Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (Formerly known as Virian Tanzania Ltd.) v CNLT (Far East) Berhad dated January 16, 2009. The Winding Up of a Public Company Listed in the Stock Exchange, by a team led by Mr Alex Chang
判决的理由:2009年1月16日,Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (原名是Virian Tanzania Ltd) v CNLT (Far East) 有限公司。由张大侓师先生率领的队伍对一家上市公司发起清盘行动。

FW Industries v Suitech (the Original grounds written by the learned Judge Hishamudin), published in the Current Law Journal: [2008] 3 CLJ 210. Two petitions to wind up the same company, our clients’ Petition was the second one and obtained the winding up order.
FW工商业 v Suitech (由希山慕丁法官所写的裁决理由),并发表在现行法侓的期刊(Current Law Journal):「2008」3 CLJ 210。这案件有两者对同一家公司呈请清盘,而我们当事人的申请是第二个但获得公司清盘指令。

PECD V FREEHOLD (the original grounds written by the learned Judge, now Judge of the Court of Appeal Dato Vincent Ng), published in the Current Law Journal: [2008] 3 CLJ 215.
PECD V FREEHOLD(由上诉法院的主审法官拿督Vincent Ng所写的),发表在现行法律的期刊(Current Law Journal): [2008] 3 CLJ 215.

Where an application to injunct our clients from filing a winding up Petition failed.
这案件是一个禁止令的申请,禁止我们的当事人发起公司清盘的申请,但这禁止令的申请不成功。

Visit www.cljlaw.com to download a copy.
如想下载一份复制请到www.cljlaw.com

Sort Comments

No Thoughts on Litigation 诉讼

Leave A Comment

Note: All fields are required. Mobile number for WhatsApp for clarification of your comments. Email and phone will not be publish.
(Required)
Mobile number for WhatsApp in order for us to clarify your comment, if necessary.
WhatsApp