{"id":9855,"date":"2021-06-19T18:34:19","date_gmt":"2021-06-19T10:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/?p=9855"},"modified":"2021-06-28T18:18:16","modified_gmt":"2021-06-28T10:18:16","slug":"mengapa-peguam-tidak-memberi-nasihat-melalui-telefon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/mengapa-peguam-tidak-memberi-nasihat-melalui-telefon\/","title":{"rendered":"Mengapa Peguam Tidak Memberi Nasihat kepada Anda Melalui Telefon – Amira Adzhar"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

English Version<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u4e2d\u6587\u7248<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mengapa Peguam Tidak Memberi Nasihat kepada Anda Melalui Telefon – Amira Adzhar<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWHY SOLICITORS DO NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE OVER THE PHONE?\u201d<\/u><\/strong><\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Mengapa Peguam Tidak Memberi Nasihat kepada Anda Melalui Telefon?<\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

First of all, the conversation below is to illustrate this whole article on the reasons why professional workers such as solicitors do not give legal advice over the phone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n


Pertama sekali, perbincangan di bawah ini adalah untuk menggambarkan keseluruhan artikel ini mengenai alasan mengapa pekerja profesional seperti peguam cara tidak memberi nasihat undang-undang melalui telefon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PATIENT:<\/strong><\/em> Hello doctor.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DOCTOR:<\/strong><\/em> Hello. How can I help you?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

PATIENT:<\/strong><\/em> I am having a headache for 3 days.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DOCTOR:<\/strong><\/em> I see. You should consume two painkillers. It will reduce your headache.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

PESAKIT<\/em><\/strong>: Helo doktor.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DOKTOR<\/em><\/strong>: Helo. Bagaimana saya boleh tolong awak?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

PESAKIT<\/em><\/strong>: Saya mengalami sakit kepala selama 3 hari.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DOKTOR<\/em><\/strong>: Saya faham. Anda perlu mengambil dua ubat penahan sakit. Ia akan mengurangkan sakit kepala anda.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the next day, that patient died from stroke. This explains that sometimes the doctors are unable to identify a physical cause. This is because doctors need to identify and described him symptoms in detail about what type of headache suffered by the patient. Doctors should consider the needs of the patient. Those are mental and physical needs. Are these needs being met by a phone call?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pada hari berikutnya, pesakit itu meninggal dunia akibat strok. Ini menjelaskan bahawa kadangkala doktor tidak dapat mengenal pasti punca fizikal. Ini kerana doktor perlu mengenal pasti dan menjelaskan kepadanya gejala secara terperinci mengenai jenis sakit kepala yang dialami oleh pesakit. Doktor harus mempertimbangkan keperluan pesakit. Itu adalah keperluan mental dan fizikal. Adakah keperluan ini dapat dipenuhi melalui panggilan telefon?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Same goes to the solicitors whereby we hear often that it is difficult to draw the line of what is considered giving legal advice and simply giving legal information over the phone. If at any point during the exchange the client reasonably believes that you are offering them legal advice. Therefore, they may think that a valid lawyer-client relationship has been established and that can be problematic. This is why solicitors should avoid giving legal advice over the phone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Begitu juga dengan peguamcara di mana kami sering mendengar bahawa sukar untuk membuat garis besar mengenai apa yang dianggap memberi nasihat undang-undang dan hanya memberikan maklumat undang-undang melalui telefon. Sekiranya pada bila-bila masa semasa pertukaran, pelanggan secara munasabah percaya bahawa anda memberikan nasihat undang-undang kepada mereka. Oleh itu, mereka mungkin berpendapat bahawa hubungan penguam-pelanggan yang sah telah terjalin dan itu boleh menimbulkan masalah. Inilah sebabnya mengapa peguam harus mengelakkan memberi nasihat undang-undang melalui telefon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Person Consultations<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Perundingan Secara Peribadi<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There are something that can never be replaced by technology and that is the level of intimacy that comes from face-to-face human connections. Regardless of whether you decide to offer phone consultations or not, there will always be some people seeking to speak with you in person. To add, in person consultations <\/em>can give the clients the opportunity to engage in high stakes conversations. If you are addressing sensitive topics, providing this style of consultation is advised. Basically, there are simply some topics that should not be addressed over the phone. Any cases involved emotional situations like divorced, children, and death requires that human element to be handled well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ada sesuatu yang tidak pernah dapat digantikan oleh teknologi dan itu adalah tahap kemesraan yang berasal dari hubungan manusia secara bersemuka. Tidak kira sama ada anda memutuskan untuk mengadakan perundingan melalui telefon atau tidak, akan selalunya ada sebilangan orang yang ingin bercakap dengan anda secara langsung. Sebagai tambahan, perundingan secara langsung dapat memberi peluang kepada klien untuk terlibat dalam perbualan yang tinggi. Sekiranya anda menangani topik-topik sensitif, disarankan untuk memberikan gaya perundingan ini. Pada dasarnya, hanya terdapat beberapa topik yang tidak boleh dibahas melalui telefon. Sebarang kes melibatkan situasi emosi seperti bercerai, anak-anak, dan kematian memerlukan elemen manusia ditangani dengan baik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On top of that, what if phone consultations led to a lower no-show rate? Convenience is the key when people are seeking answers to their problems. Being able to get an answer over the phone rather than wait for an uncertain amount of time is what many people are looking for nowadays because they do not want to wait. This demand for immediacy can eliminate the need to \u201cbuild rapport\u201d for a relationship to build between the client and the solicitor. The urgency some people are facing leads to people making faster decisions based on other sources such as website and reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Selain itu, bagaimana jika perundingan telefon menyebabkan kadar tidak hadir lebih rendah? Kemudahan adalah kunci ketika orang mencari jawapan untuk masalah mereka. Mampu mendapatkan jawapan melalui telefon daripada menunggu jumlah masa yang tidak pasti adalah apa yang dicari ramai orang pada masa ini kerana mereka tidak mahu menunggu. Permintaan untuk segera ini dapat menghilangkan kebutuhan untuk “membina hubungan” untuk hubungan yang terjalin antara klien dan peguam cara. Desakan sesetengah orang menyebabkan orang membuat keputusan yang lebih pantas berdasarkan sumber lain seperti laman web dan ulasan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To add, the solicitors cannot obtain all of the information they need to provide an appropriate and competent legal advice through communicating over the phone with people anonymously and confidentially. In order to provide proper advice, the solicitors must be able to communicate in a way to obtain all of the information they need. They also need to be able to research the issue properly, and this is not possible when the person is anonymous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tambahan pula, peguam tidak dapat memperolehi semua maklumat yang mereka perlukan untuk memberikan nasihat undang-undang yang sesuai dan kompeten dengan komunikasi melalui telefon dengan orang-orang tanpa nama dan sulit. Untuk memberi nasihat yang tepat, peguam mesti dapat berkomunikasi dengan cara untuk mendapatkan semua maklumat yang mereka perlukan. Mereka juga harus dapat meneliti masalah ini dengan betul, dan ini tidak mungkin berlaku apabila orang itu tidak dikenali.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The solicitor could have a conflict of interest. When people come to them for advice, they need to make certain that he do not have a conflict of some kind. The solicitor could end up helping someone on the other side of a case or he could do something that would harm a current or past client. The solicitor cannot do this and therefore, he has to know who the person is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peguamcara boleh mengalami konflik kepentingan. Ketika orang-orang mendatangi mereka untuk mendapatkan nasihat, mereka harus memastikan bahawa dia tidak mengalami konflik semacam itu. Peguamcara akhirnya dapat menolong seseorang di seberang kes atau dia boleh melakukan sesuatu yang akan membahayakan pelanggan semasa atau masa lalu. Peguamcara tidak dapat melakukan ini dan oleh itu, dia harus tahu siapa orang itu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Kesimpulan<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Phone consultations take less time and focus on a single problem. In-person consultations involved more problem disclosure. There are certainly some situations, such as bankruptcy and criminal defense, where providing phone consultations is the quick and easy solution for your clients. Providing phone consultation can even give you the freedom and flexibility to work remotely. However, the traditional in-person style is a standard in the legal world, especially for emotionally charged situations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perundingan melalui telefon memerlukan sedikit masa dan fokus pada satu masalah. Perundingan secara peribadi melibatkan pendedahan lebih banyak masalah. Sudah tentu terdapat beberapa situasi, seperti kebankrapan dan pembelaan jenayah, di mana memberikan perundingan melalui telefon adalah penyelesaian yang cepat dan mudah untuk pelanggan anda. Menyediakan perundingan telefon boleh memberi anda kebebasan dan fleksibiliti untuk bekerja dari jauh. Walau bagaimanapun, gaya tradisional secara peribada adalah standard dalam dunia undang-undang, terutamanya untuk situasi yang dikenakan emosi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amira Adzhar<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

English Version \u4e2d\u6587\u7248 Mengapa Peguam Tidak Memberi Nasihat kepada Anda Melalui Telefon – Amira Adzhar \u201cWHY SOLICITORS DO NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE OVER THE PHONE?\u201d Mengapa Peguam Tidak Memberi Nasihat kepada Anda Melalui Telefon? First of all, the conversation below is to illustrate this whole article on the reasons why professional workers such as solicitors […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1804,"featured_media":6605,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[80],"tags":[81],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9855"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1804"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9855"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9855\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9862,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9855\/revisions\/9862"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6605"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}