{"id":6440,"date":"2018-09-10T21:43:36","date_gmt":"2018-09-10T13:43:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/?p=6440"},"modified":"2024-11-29T17:35:23","modified_gmt":"2024-11-29T09:35:23","slug":"menggulung-syarikat-itu-yang-ingin-menggulung-syarikat-kami","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/menggulung-syarikat-itu-yang-ingin-menggulung-syarikat-kami\/","title":{"rendered":"Menggulung Syarikat yang ingin Menggulung Syarikat Kami"},"content":{"rendered":"

Menggulung Syarikat yang ingin Menggulung Syarikat Kami<\/u><\/p>\n

Wound Up the Company Who Tried to Wind us Up<\/a><\/p>\n

FORE-SIGHT MARKETING SDN. BHD.\u00a0 And\u00a0 QUINTRAZ SDN. BHD.<\/h5>\n
1. Terdapat dakwaan bahawa perjanjian pinjaman berjumlah RM1,080,000.00 telah dimeterai antara salah seorang pengarah (bapa saya) Fore-sight Marketing Sdn. Bhd dan Quintraz Sdn. Bhd.<\/h5>\n
\u00a0There was an allegation that a loan agreement for the sum of RM1,080,000.00\u00a0\u00a0 was entered into between one of the director (my father)\u00a0 of\u00a0 Fore-sight Marketing Sdn. Bhd and Quintraz Sdn. Bhd.<\/em><\/h6>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
  • \n
    Walau bagaimanapun, bagi pihak Fore-sight Marketing Sdn Bhd, rekod transaksi sedemikian tidak terdapat di syarikat masing-masing.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
    However, on the part of\u00a0 \u00a0Fore-sight Marketing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 there was no record of such transaction in their respective company.<\/em><\/h6>\n
      \n
    • \n
      Saya tidak mengetahui tentang perjanjian pinjaman..<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
      \u00a0\u00a0I had no idea of the loan agreement.<\/em><\/h6>\n
        \n
      • \n
        Fore-sight Marketing<\/h5>\n

        tidak menerima pinjaman<\/p>\n

        .<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
        \u00a0Fore-sight Marketing did not receive the loan.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          \n
        1. \n
          Quintraz Sdn Bhd kemudian membuat tuntutan jumlah sebanyak RM1,080,000.00 yang dibina atas perjanjian pinjaman selepas menyampaikan petisyen penggulungan.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
          \u00a0 \u00a0Quintraz Sdn. Bhd.\u00a0\u00a0 then\u00a0 made a\u00a0 claim\u00a0 for the sum of\u00a0 RM1,080,000.00\u00a0\u00a0 premised on the loan agreement thereafter presented\u00a0 a winding up petition.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          3\u00a0 Kami berjuang dengan bersungguh-sungguh, tetapi kami kalah dalam pertempuran di Mahkamah Tinggi. Ini memang tidak dapat dijangkakan.<\/h5>\n
          3.1 Yang paling sukar diterima ialah Quintraz rupa-rupanya syarikat yang tidak aktif.<\/h5>\n
          \u00a0Hard as we fought we lost the battle in the High Court.\u00a0\u00a0 It was totally out of our expectation.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          \u00a0The hardest to accept was that Quintraz who was a dormant company<\/em>.<\/h6>\n

          Syarikat Kami telah Digulungkan<\/h4>\n

          Our Company Was Wound Up<\/em><\/h6>\n
          4 Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Yang Bijaksana memberikan perintah penggulungan :<\/h5>\n
          The learned High Court Judge granted a winding up order as:<\/em><\/h6>\n

          4.1 Terdapat perjanjian pinjaman yang didakwa dilaksanakan oleh salah seorang pengarah Fore-sight Marketing Sdn. Bhd.<\/p>\n

          There was a loan agreement allegedly executed by one of the directors of\u00a0Fore-sight Marketing Sdn. Bhd.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          4.2 Pengarah tersebut tidak mengesahkan apa-apa afidavit atau menghadiri perbicaraan untuk menafikan bahawa perjanjian pinjaman itu dimeterai antara pihak-pihak tersebut.<\/h5>\n
          \u00a0The said director did not affirm any affidavit or attend to the hearing to deny that the loan agreement was entered into between parties.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          4.3 Ini adalah tidak praktikal bagi pengarah yang lain untuk menafikan kewujudan perjanjian pinjaman itu dan menyatakan bahawa pengarah yang didakwa melaksanakan perjanjian pinjaman itu hilang kerana kedua-dua pengarah adalah hubungan ayah dan anak.<\/h5>\n
          \u00a0It was otiose for the other director to deny the existence of the loan agreement and state that the director who allegedly executed the loan agreement vanished into the thin air as both the directors are in a father and son relationship.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/h6>\n
          5 Ini adalah\u00a0 keputusan yang menyedihkan, apa yang dimaksudkan ialah syarikat saya digulung dan ini merupakan salah satu sumber pendapatan utama bagi keluarga saya.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0It was a devastating decision, what it meant was that my company was wound up and it is one of the main sources of\u00a0 income for the family.<\/em>
          \n<\/em>
          \n5.1 Alasan Penghakiman Mahkamah Tinggi ditulis dengan baik sekali dan dengan terperinci tentang mengapa syarikat kami harus digulung …\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0The High Court Grounds of Judgment was so well written detailing why our company should be wound up\u2026<\/em>\u00a05.2 Ini begitu menyakitkan untuk dibaca.<\/h5>\n

          It was painful\u00a0 to read\u2026<\/em>
          \nRayuan ke Mahkamah Rayuan6 Fore-sight Marketing\u00a0 merayu terhadap keputusan tersebut..<\/p>\n

          Appeal to the Court of Appeal<\/em><\/h4>\n
          6 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Fore-sight Marketing appealed against the said decision.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          Tetuan Alex Chang & Co disyorkan oleh firma di luar Kuala Lumpur
          \n7 Kami datang untuk berjumpa dengan Encik Chang atas cadangan firma peguam Johor dan juga seorang firma peguam Melaka.\u00a0Messrs Alex Chang & Co Recommended By Firms Outside Kuala Lumpur<\/em><\/h5>\n
          7 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0We\u00a0 came to see Mr Chang upon the recommendation of a firm of Johor lawyer and also a firm Malacca\u00a0 lawyer.<\/em>
          \nDitolak Untuk Bertindak<\/h6>\n
          8 Pada mesyuarat pertama, Encik Chang menolak permintaan kami untuk bertindak bagi pihak kami dalam rayuan atas sebab yang mudah:<\/h5>\n

          Declined to Act<\/em><\/h4>\n
          8 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0At the first meeting, Mr Chang declined our invitation to act for us in the appeal on the simple reason:<\/em><\/h6>\n
          8.1 Encik Chang bertanya: “Adakah anda sebagai anak lelaki, mempertikaikan tandatangan itu adalah ayah anda dalam perjanjian pinjaman?”<\/h5>\n
          Mr Chang asked: \u201cDid you as the son, dispute the signature was that of your father\u2019s in the loan agreement?\u201d<\/em>
          \n<\/em>
          \n8.2 Jawapan:\u201dTidak.\u201d
          \n\u00a0\u00a0Answer: \u201cNo.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n
          8.3 Encik Chang:\u201d Oleh kerana anda tidak mempertikaikan tandatangan tersebut, saya tidak dapat mengendalikan rayuan ini…Minta maaf .\u201d\u00a0Mr Chang: \u201cSince you did not dispute the signature,\u00a0\u00a0 I am not able to handle this appeal\u2026 So sorry.\u201d<\/em>
          \n<\/em>
          \n9 \u00a0Selepas beberapa pujukan daripada keluarga saya, Encik Chang kemudiannya bersetuju untuk melihat ke dalam perkara itu dan menerima ucapan ringkas pada hari berikutnya.\u00a0After some\u00a0persuasion from\u00a0 my family, Mr Chang then agreed to look into the matter and accepted the brief the next\u00a0 day.<\/em><\/h5>\n
          10 Kami duduk dalam keadaan yang dingin di Mahkamah Rayuan untuk mendengar hujah-hujah dari pelbagai kaunsel yang bijaksana. Kami adalah yang terakhir …\u00a0We were seated in the cold the Court of Appeal listening to the arguments from various learned counsel.\u00a0\u00a0 Ours was the last one\u2026<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0Pendekatan yang Berbeza
          \n11 Di Mahkamah Rayuan, pendekatan yang berbeza daripada yang ada di Mahkamah Tinggi diambil. Banyak alasan telah dikemukakan dalam 25 minit yang disampaikan dengan pendek oleh Encik Chang.<\/h5>\n

          Different Approach<\/em><\/h4>\n
          11 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0In the Court of Appeal, an approach\u00a0 different from the one in the High Court\u00a0 was taken.\u00a0 Many grounds were advanced in the short 25 minutes of presentation by Mr Chang.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Rayuan Dibenarkan\u00a012 Akhirnya, Mahkamah Rayuan membenarkan rayuan kami, membalikkan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi dan menolak permohonan penggulungan yang mengetepikan perintah penggulungan dengan alasan-alasan berikut:<\/h5>\n

          Appeal Allowed<\/em><\/h4>\n
          12 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Finally,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Court\u00a0 of Appeal allowed our appeal,\u00a0\u00a0 reversed the decision of the\u00a0 High Court and dismissed\u00a0 the winding up petition set aside the winding up Order\u00a0 with the following grounds inter alia that:<\/em><\/h6>\n
          \u00a012.1 Tidak ada bukti bahawa Quintraz yang merupakan syarikat yang tidak aktif mampu memberikan pinjaman RM1 juta kepada kami.\u00a0\u00a0The is no evidence that Quintraz who was a dormant company was capable of granting us a RM1 million loan.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n
          12.2 Akaun teraudit tidak mencerminkan jumlah pinjaman daripada pemberi pinjaman yang dikatakan;<\/h5>\n

          \u00a0The audited accounts did not reflect\u00a0 the loan sum from the alleged lender;<\/em><\/p>\n

          12.3 Tiada ketetapan boleh didapati untuk memberi kuasa tindakan Pemasaran Fore-sight untuk menerima pinjaman;\u00a0\u00a0No resolution could be found to\u00a0authorize\u00a0 the action of\u00a0 Fore-sight Marketing\u00a0\u00a0 accepting the\u00a0\u00a0 loan;<\/em><\/h5>\n
          12.4 Tambahan pula, tiada bukti menunjukkan bahawa jumlah RM1,080,000.00 telah dikeluarkan dan diterima oleh Fore-sight Marketing.\u00a0\u00a0Furthermore, no evidence to\u00a0 show\u00a0 that the sum of\u00a0 RM1,080,000.00 was disbursed and received by Fore-sight Marketing<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0Lima Bulan Tidak Tidur Malam
          \n13 Itulah pengakhiran lima bulan tanpa tidur malam. Menunggu adalah salah satu pengalaman yang paling menyakitkan. Menunggu rayuan untuk didengar tanpa mengetahui hasilnya berasa mencekik, tiada kata-kata selesa<\/span> dari Encik Chang yang dapat memadamkan agitasi dan pergolakan yang kami rasakan.<\/h5>\n

          5 Months\u2019 Sleepless Night<\/em><\/h4>\n
          13 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0That ended\u00a0 5 months of sleepless nights.\u00a0\u00a0 Waiting is one of the most painful experiences.\u00a0\u00a0 Waiting for the appeal to be heard not knowing the outcome is suffocating, no amount of\u00a0 comforting words from Mr Chang could quell the agitation and unrest\u00a0 we felt.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          \u00a0\u00a0Menggulung Syarikat yang ingin Menggulung Syarikat Kami
          \n14 Kisah ini mempunyai pengakhiran yang tidak diduga. Kami pergi menggulung QUINTRAZ untuk menutup bab ini sekali gus<\/h5>\n

          Wound Up the Company Who Tried to Wind us Up<\/em><\/h4>\n
          \u00a0This story has an unexpected ending.\u00a0\u00a0 We\u00a0 proceeded\u00a0 to Wind up\u00a0 QUINTRAZ to close this chapter once and for all.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0Terima Kasih Tetuan Alex Chang & Co<\/h6>\n
          15 Kami merakamkan penghargaan kami dengan ikhlas terhadap dedikasi dan profesionalisme yang ditunjukkan oleh Messrs Alex Chang & Co dalam menangani perkara di atas.<\/h5>\n

          Thank You Messrs Alex Chang & Co<\/em><\/h4>\n
          15 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0We sincerely record our appreciation to the dedication and professionalism shown by Messrs Alex Chang & Co in the handling of the above matter.<\/em><\/h6>\n
          15.1 Mereka berusaha dengan bersungguh-sungguh untuk memastikan dan membalikkan perintah penggulungan terhadap semua kemungkinan.\u00a0\u00a0They took the extra mile to ensure and reverse the winding up order against all odds.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0Kenny Yue<\/h5>\n
          \u201cThe Malay Version is a translation to the best efforts and if there is a conflict between the translation and the English version, please refer to the English version.<\/em><\/h5>\n
          \u201cVersi Bahasa Melayu ini adalah penterjemahan berpandukan usaha-usaha kami yang terbaik dan seandainya terdapat konflik di antara terjemahan dan versi Bahasa Inggeris, sila rujuk kepada versi Bahasa Inggeris.\u201d\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n
          \u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n
          Translated by Alicia<\/em><\/h5>\n
          Amended by Khairunnisa, Celine<\/em><\/h5>\n
          \u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Menggulung Syarikat yang ingin Menggulung Syarikat Kami Wound Up the Company Who Tried to Wind us Up FORE-SIGHT MARKETING SDN. BHD.\u00a0 And\u00a0 QUINTRAZ SDN. BHD. 1. Terdapat dakwaan bahawa perjanjian pinjaman berjumlah RM1,080,000.00 telah dimeterai antara salah seorang pengarah (bapa saya) Fore-sight Marketing Sdn. Bhd dan Quintraz Sdn. Bhd. \u00a0There was an allegation that a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1805,"featured_media":11625,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[80],"tags":[81],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6440"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1805"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6440"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11626,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6440\/revisions\/11626"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}