English Version<\/a> New cases are added yearly since 1995 to our list of reported\/ published cases, now numbering more than 30, on debt recovery, winding up, injunctions and other areas.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Litigasi English Version \u4e2d\u6587\u7248 Kes-kes baru bertambah setiap tahun dalam senarai kes kami yang dilaporkan\/diterbitkan sejak 1995, sekarang berjumlah lebih 30, tentang mendapatkan semula hutang, penggulungan, injunksi dan bidang-bidang lain New cases are added yearly since 1995 to our list of reported\/ published cases, now numbering more than 30, on debt recovery, winding up, injunctions […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1805,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[80,76],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6172"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1805"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6172"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6172\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8361,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6172\/revisions\/8361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexchanglaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n\u4e2d\u6587\u7248<\/a><\/p>\nKes-kes baru bertambah setiap tahun dalam senarai kes kami yang dilaporkan\/diterbitkan sejak 1995, sekarang berjumlah lebih 30, tentang mendapatkan semula hutang, penggulungan, injunksi dan bidang-bidang lain<\/h5>\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0Yap Kit Wah & 30 Ors v Yap Kim Choon @ Yap Siw Sin & 2 Ors<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0bertarikh 13 haribulan Oktober, 2014<\/h5>\n
The Groun<\/em>ds of Judgment:\u00a0<\/em>Yap Kit Wah & 30 Ors v Yap Kim Choon @ Yap Siw Sin & 2 Ors<\/em><\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0dated October 13, 2014<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd v Saiful Rais Bin Shaiks Salim and 2 Others<\/a> bertarikh 30 haribulan September, 2014<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Decision:\u00a0<\/em>LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd v Saiful Rais Bin Shaiks Salim and 2 Others<\/em><\/a> dated September 30, 2014<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman: Z. New Image Sdn Bhd v Loh Yok Liang<\/a>\u00a0bertarikh 5 haribulan Ogos, 2014.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Decision:\u00a0<\/em>N. Z. New Image Sdn Bhd v Loh Yok Liang<\/em><\/a>\u00a0<\/em>dated August 5, 2014.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Perintah yang termeterai daripada Mahkamah Rayuan melalui W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03\/2014 bertarikh 14 haribulan Ogos, 2014: Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd v Quintraz Sdn Bhd<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The\u00a0<\/em>sealed order<\/em><\/a>\u00a0from the Court of Appeal vide W-02(NCC)(A)-466-03\/2014 dated August 14, 2014: Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd v Quintraz Sdn Bhd<\/em><\/h5>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0Quintraz Sdn Bhd v Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd<\/a>bertarikh 5 haribulan Mac, 2014<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Judgment:\u00a0<\/em>Quintraz Sdn Bhd v Fore-Sight Marketing Sdn Bhd<\/a><\/em><\/strong>\u00a0dated March 5, 2014<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0Bumitech Marketing Sdn Bhd v Suasa Efektif (M) Sdn\u00a0\u00a0<\/a>Bhd<\/a>bertarikh 10 haribulan Mei, 2012, satu kes dimana dua pengarah syarikat didapati menghina mahkamah dan dijatuhkan hukuman penjara dua minggu<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Judgment:\u00a0Bumitech Marketing Sdn Bhd v Suasa Efektif (M) Sdn\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/em>Bhd<\/em><\/a>\u00a0dated May 10, 2012, a case where two company directors were held in contempt of court and sentenced to\u00a0Two weeks\u2019 imprisonment.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0CCM Chemicals Sdn Bhd\u00a0<\/a>v W<\/a>an\u00a0<\/a>M<\/a>uhamad\u00a0<\/a>I<\/a>brisam<\/a>W<\/a>an\u00a0<\/a>I<\/a>brahim<\/a>\u00a0bertarikh 23 haribulan Mei, 2011, \u00a0\u00a0[2011] 1 LNS 1011, satu kes dimana pengarah mendakwa yang dia tidak menandatangani jaminan, walau bagaimanapun penghakiman tetap diberikan.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Judgment:\u00a0<\/em>CCM Chemicals Sdn Bhd\u00a0<\/em><\/a>v W<\/em><\/a>an\u00a0<\/em><\/a>M<\/em><\/a>uhamad\u00a0<\/em><\/a>I<\/em><\/a>brisam<\/em><\/a>\u00a0W<\/em><\/a>an\u00a0<\/em><\/a>I<\/em><\/a>brahim<\/em><\/a>\u00a0dated May 23, 2011, \u00a0\u00a0[2011] 1 LNS 1011, on a case where the director claimed that he\u00a0did not sign the guarantee, nevertheless a judgment was granted.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0Choong Lee Kwang v Dayatera Roof Systems Sdn Bhd\u00a0<\/a>bertarikh 24 Julai, 2009,\u00a0 [2009] 1 LNS 1718 \u00a0dimana pengarah memulakan tindakan penggulungan untuk menggulung syarikatnya sendiri<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Judgment:\u00a0Choong Lee Kwang v Dayatera Roof Systems Sdn Bhd\u00a0<\/a>dated July 24, 2009,\u00a0 [2009] 1 LNS 1718 \u00a0where a director initiated a\u00a0winding up\u00a0 action to wind up his own company.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
Alasan Penghakiman:\u00a0Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai Virian\u00a0<\/a>Tanzania Ltd.) v CNLT (Far East) Berhad<\/a>bertarikh 16 haribulan Januari, 2009. Penggulungan Syarikat Awam yang Tersenarai dalam Pertukaran Saham, oleh pasukan yang diketuai oleh Encik Alex Chang.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Grounds of Judgment:\u00a0Vearrian Tanzania Ltd (Formerly known as Virian\u00a0<\/a><\/em>Tanzania Ltd.) v CNLT (Far East) Berhad<\/em><\/a>\u00a0dated January 16, 2009. The\u00a0Winding Up of a Public Company Listed in the Stock Exchange, by a team led by Mr Alex Chang<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
FW Industries v Suitech<\/a>(Alasan asal disediakan oleh Tuan Hakim Yang Arif Hishamudin), diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Undang-Undang Semasa: [2008] 3 CLJ 210.\u00a0Dua petisyen untuk menggulung syarikat yang sama,\u00a0petisyen klien kami adalah yang kedua dan mendapatkan perintah penggulungan.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
FW Industries v Suitech<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(the Original grounds written by the learned Judge Hishamudin), published in the Current Law Journal: [2008] 3 CLJ 210.\u00a0Two petitions to wind up the same company,\u00a0our clients\u2019 Petition was the second one and obtained the winding up order.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\n
PECD V FREEHOLD<\/a>(Alasan asal disediakan oleh Tuan Hakim, kini Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan Yang Arif Dato Vincent Ng), diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Undang-Undang Semasa:\u00a0 [2008] 3 CLJ 215.\u00a0\u00a0 Dimana permohonan untuk menghalang klien kami daripada memfailkan petisyen penggulungan gagal.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
PECD V FREEHOLD<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(the original grounds written by the learned Judge, now Judge of the Court of Appeal Dato Vincent Ng), published \u00a0in the Current Law Journal:\u00a0 [2008] 3 CLJ 215.\u00a0\u00a0 Where an\u00a0application to injunct our clients from filing a winding up Petition failed.<\/em><\/h6>\n
\u201cThe Malay Version is a translation to the best efforts and if there is a conflict between the translation and the English version, please refer to the English version.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n
\u201cVersi Bahasa Melayu ini adalah usaha terbaik kami untuk menterjemah. Jika ada konflik di antara terjemahan Bahasa Melayu dengan versi Bahasa Inggeris, sila rujuk versi Bahasa Inggeris.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n
Translated by Khairunnisa<\/em><\/h5>\n
Amended by Celine, Yugi<\/em><\/h5>\n
Cross checked by Jessie<\/em><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"